Bayesian Model Selection Explained
Why a more flexible model can be less probable, and how that lets a search terminate.
Why a more flexible model can be less probable, and how that lets a search terminate.
Rather than the best fit a model can achieve, Bayesian model selection asks how probable the observed data is under the model as a whole, integrating over parameters weighted by the prior. A model with many parameters can fit many datasets; it must therefore assign less probability to each.
A search that scored candidates by best fit alone would always prefer the most elaborate structure, and would never stop. Scoring by evidence gives the search a natural termination point and produces the parsimonious structures that make an explanation readable.
The integral is rarely tractable, so BIC, WAIC or cross-validation stand in for it. The evidence is also sensitive to the prior in ways the maximum likelihood is not — a vague prior on a parameter that matters can dominate the comparison. Automated systems should report the priors they used.
Selection tells you which candidate is best supported. It says nothing about whether any candidate is adequate. That is the job of model criticism.